Home›How to collect antique paintings›Pastoral Scenes, Shepherds and Sheep ...
Pastoral Scenes, Shepherds and Sheep in 19th-Century French Painting
A pastoral painting is the nineteenth-century French landscape in which working figures and their animals are inseparable from the land. A shepherdess among her flock at dusk, a farmer driving oxen along a country road, a herd at rest under an oak. It ruled the Paris Salon for fifty years and filled the galleries of American industrialists in Boston, Pittsburgh and Chicago.
What changed in the nineteenth century was the seriousness. The eighteenth had given the pastoral to porcelain shepherdesses, to playful Boucher and decorative Fragonard. The nineteenth took it back and gave it the weight academic painters had reserved for biblical scenes.
Swipe →
| The eighteenth century Arcadian youths in white tunics, ribbons on the crooks, sheep as ornament. A pastoral of the drawing room, painted for people who had never stood in a field. | The nineteenth century French peasants in patched clothes and wooden clogs, painted in the countryside they actually worked. Particular breeds, particular fleece, particular weather, at a specific hour of a specific season. |
| That realism was a deliberate choice. It is what made Millet scandalous to the Salon of 1857. | |
Broader than it sounds
What Counts as a Pastoral Painting |
A pastoral painting in the nineteenth-century French sense is any landscape in which working figures and their animals are integrated with the land. A shepherd with sheep is the classic case. But a farmer driving cattle, a woman walking behind a hay cart, a herd of cows drinking at a pond, a flock at rest under a tree, all belong to the same tradition. The figures are not portraits. The animals are not pets. The land is not ornament. The three work together as a single image of rural labour, observed rather than imagined.
Five signs
How to Recognise a Pastoral Landscape Painting |
Swipe →
| Work, not leisure | A shepherd with a staff, a woman bent in a wheatfield, a farmer with a plough. If the figures are picnicking, parading or playing music, you are not looking at a pastoral in the Realist sense. | |
| Earth below, light above | The foreground is muted, greens knocked down with brown and raw sienna, while the sky carries the warmth. A band of gold along the horizon at dusk, a soft pink at dawn. That contrast is structural to the genre. | |
| Animals as subject | The sheep, cattle or horses are observed with the same care as the figures. Look at how Charles Jacque renders an individual ewe's fleece, or how Troyon paints the muscle of a cow's flank. These animals were studied in real fields and barns. | |
| A confident signature | Most second-generation Realists signed their pastoral work clearly, lower right or lower left. The signature was part of the picture's commercial life. An unsigned canvas is not a problem, but it is a different object. | |
| Two scales, both real | Salon-ambitious canvases run two by three feet or larger, in oil on canvas. Plein-air studies and small finished works run six to fifteen inches, often in oil on panel. The big ones give you presence on a wall, the small ones the intimacy of an object held in the hand. |
1849 — 1884
The Painters of French Pastoral Painting |
| Jean-François Millet1814 — 1875 | The painter who made the whole genre serious. He grew up on a small Norman farm, trained in Paris under Delaroche, and moved permanently to Barbizon in 1849, where he spent the rest of his life painting the rural labour he had grown up among. In the Shepherdess with her Flock at the Musée d'Orsay, a young woman in a heavy red cape stands at the front of her flock, head bowed, knitting needles in her hands. The horizon is low, the sky vast, and the composition carries the moral weight academic painters had reserved for scripture. |
| Charles Jacque1813 — 1894 | Millet's friend and neighbour at Barbizon, and the unchallenged specialist in sheep. He raised them himself, owned flocks, and painted them with a knowledge no studio observation could produce. His compositions are built around the flock as a moving mass, the shepherd secondary. The light is almost always dawn or dusk, the hours when the flock is between the pen and the pasture. The Brooklyn Museum, the Walters, Cleveland and the Isabella Stewart Gardner all hold him. |
| Rosa Bonheur1822 — 1899 | The most widely exhibited painter of her century, of any gender. Ploughing in the Nivernais, painted at twenty-seven and shown at the Salon of 1849, made her career. Six oxen drag a plough across a freshly broken field, the morning mist rising behind them, two peasants walking alongside. The animals are individually observed and the light is the cool light of late autumn in central France. Her large canvases have the scale and ambition of history painting. |
| Jules Breton1827 — 1906 | He came out of the same Realist tradition as Millet and pushed it toward a more luminous register. The Song of the Lark, 1884, is the most loved painting at the Art Institute of Chicago. A barefoot peasant girl stands at the edge of a wheatfield at dawn, face turned up toward an unseen bird, a sickle held loosely at her side. She has the bearing of a saint, and the bare feet and the sickle put her squarely in the working country. Van Gogh copied him as a student. |
| Constant Troyon1810 — 1865 | The cattle painter of the Barbizon group. He matters to this category because his success in the 1850s and 1860s established that a composition of animals and landscape could command the same attention as a figure painting. Without that breakthrough, the broad audience for Jacque, Bonheur and Breton would have taken longer to form. |
Three rules
Buying a Pastoral Landscape Painting |
The second generation is deep. Pastoral painting sold well through the late nineteenth century, so hundreds of accomplished provincial Realists worked in the manner. Many remain poorly catalogued, and the field rewards an eye more than a name.
Check the signature, then the animals. Most of these painters signed, lower right or lower left. And the quality shows in the livestock before it shows anywhere else, because an animal painted from memory never convinces.
Women at work are a large part of the field. Shepherdesses, gleaners, peasants in the fields. That part of the Realist tradition sat below the great male-figure compositions in attention for a long time, and museum interest in Rosa Bonheur has been shifting it.
A shepherdess with her flock in 1872 is the same shepherdess now. The picture depends on no fashion cycle and needs no knowledge of art-historical disputes to be moving.
In public collections
Where to See Them |
Jean-François Millet, Shepherdess with her Flock, 1864. Musée d'Orsay, Paris.
Jean-François Millet, The Gleaners, 1857. Musée d'Orsay, Paris.
Jean-François Millet, The Sower, 1850. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.
Rosa Bonheur, The Horse Fair, 1855. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
Rosa Bonheur, Ploughing in the Nivernais, 1849. Musée d'Orsay, Paris.
Charles-Émile Jacque, Leaving the Sheep Pen. Brooklyn Museum, New York.
Jules Breton, The Song of the Lark, 1884. Art Institute of Chicago.
Constant Troyon, Cattle Drinking. Walters Art Museum, Baltimore.
Sources. Musée d'Orsay, Museum of Fine Arts Boston, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Brooklyn Museum, Art Institute of Chicago, Walters Art Museum.
