Van Dyck painted the Earl of Arundel around 1620. Two centuries later the face was still being copied, on a panel the size of a hand.
The original is in the Getty Museum. The copy is in this collection.
The courtierA ruff, a black cloak and the gold pendant of the Garter, two hundred years after the sitting.Earl of Arundel, after Van Dyck, 1800s
The emperorA face every subject knew, painted again at nine inches high.Emperor Joseph II, Austrian School, 1800s
The archdukeWhite coat, Golden Fleece, and a label on the back that gives him a name.Archduke in White Uniform, Austrian School, about 1800
A royal portrait was designed to be repeated. Each copy after it is an original oil painting of its own time, not a later fake.
Why Royal Portraits Were Copied
The king could sit for one portrait. He could not hang in every room that needed him.
One copy for
1sittingpainted from life
An embassy abroadA provincial parliamentA ministry in the capitalA loyal noble houseA foreign court, as a gift
A copy was not a fake. It was how the face reached the room.
How a Royal Portrait Workshop Worked
Rigaud's account books record, for each commission, how much of the canvas he painted himself.
Entirely his handRecorded in the books as his own work.
The head onlyAssistants laid in the velvet, the lace and the ground.
Supervised replicaPainted in his rooms, to his design, sold with his approval.
All three left the same door, and all three were period originals.
How to Read a Later Copy of a Court Portrait
Look for what the copyist kept, and what the owner added.
Earl of Arundel, after Anthony van Dyck, 1800s, oil on panel
Detail of the face.The faceWhat was keptA short beard above a stiff white ruffThe likeness the copy existed to carry
Detail of the hand.The handThe badgeThe hand rests over a gold pendantThe badge of Saint George, emblem of the Garter
Detail of the back.The backWhat was addedA handwritten page pasted over the panelMrs Jameson on Arundel, the first virtuoso of his time
Two centuries on, the copy still came with a reason to hang it.
What Happened to Royal Portraits After 1793
Four fates for a king's face in a republic.
BurnedSome, in the public bonfires of the Revolution.
DefacedThe face slashed or the arms painted out, the canvas kept.
HiddenRolled into an attic by a family that meant to bring it back.
Sold onThe name quietly lost, and the sitter became a gentleman.
The fourth is why so many unnamed portraits look grander than their labels.
Buying an Antique Royal Portrait
The face against the laceOn a workshop version the face is often stronger. That is the division of labor showing, not a fault.
A famous face is a copyIf every subject knew the sitter, the canvas is almost certainly a later version, not the sitting itself. That is how these portraits were meant to travel.
Works citedAnthony van Dyck, Thomas Howard, Earl of Arundel, about 1620-1621. J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles